![]()
Written by Rev. Alan Cairns,
Greenville, South Carolina Distributed by Toronto Free
Presbyterian Church 1600 Neilson Road, Scarborough, Ontario
M1X 1S3
Dr. Billy Graham constantly
appeals to the Bible as the authority for his teaching. "The
Bible says" is one of his most used expressions. It is good to
make our appeal to Scripture, for it alone can be our final
authority (Isaiah 8:20). But it must be more than empty words.
There must be a full submission to what the Bible says. In the
case of Billy Graham the question is:
Does the Bible support the statements and actions of Dr.
Graham? We must weigh Dr. Graham's words against the
Bible -- with startling results.
DR. GRAHAM
DECLARES HIS GOSPEL TO BE THAT OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC
CHURCH.
Speaking at the Roman
Catholic Belmont Abbey College, Noth Carolina, Dr. Graham
said: "The gospel that built this school and the gospel
that brings me here tonight is still the way to salvation"
(Gastonia Gazette, November 22, 1967). That is plain
enough. The then executive vice-president of Belmont Abbey
College, Rev. Cuthbert E. Allen, agreed. He wrote, "I have
followed Billy Graham's career and I must emphasize that he
has been more Catholic than otherwise... Billy Graham is
preaching a moral and evangelical theology most acceptable to
Catholics." (Personal letter, reproduced in Billy Graham
and the Church of Rome, by I.R.K. Paisley, Appendix.
Document No.3).
The question is: What is the gospel according to the
church of Rome?
1. Rome's gospel
denies the full and final authority of Scripture.
The Second Vatican
Council flatly decreed: "The Church does not draw her
certainty about all revealed truth from the Holy Scriptures
alone. Hence both Scripture and Tradition must be
accepted and honored with equal feelings of devotion
and reverence." (Vatican II. Dei Veruum II.9).
The Bible says, "To the law and to the testimony: if they
speak not according to this word, it is because there is no
light in them" (Isaiah 8:20). The reason for this is simple --
only in Scripture do we have God's inspired, authoritative
Word: "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is
profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for
instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may be
perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works" (II Timothy
3:16). To be adequately equipped, we need nothing more than
Scripture.
Paul's warning is much to the point: "Beware lest any man
spoil you... after the tradition of men" (Colossians
2:8).
Does Billy Graham preach Rome's gospel, as he
claimed?
2. Rome's
gospel denies the once-for-all atoning sacrifice of
Christ.
"The mystery of the
Eucharist is the true center of the sacred liturgy and indeed
of the whole Christian life" (Vaican II, Eucharisticum
Mysterium, Intro. A.). In this central act of worship Rome
claims that the Mass is "a sacrifice in which the sacrifice of
the cross is perpetuated." Again: "In the sacrifice of the
Mass our Lord is immolated" [i.e., killed as a sacrifice].
According to Rome, "in it [the Mass] Christ perpetuates in an
unbloody manner the sacrifice offered on the cross, offering
Himself to the Father for the world's salvation through the
ministry of the priests" (Vat. II, Euch. Myst. Intro.
C).
Against all this the Bible says, "This man, after he had
offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on
the right hand of God" (Hebrews 10:12). Jesus exclaimed on the
cross, "It is finished" (John 19:30), the meaning of
which is fully explained in Hebrews 9:24-26: "[Christ is
entered] into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of
God for us: nor yet that he should offer himself often
... for then must he often have suffered ... but now once in
the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the
sacrifice of himself."
Rome's gospel is a blasphemous denial of Christ's
atonement.
Does Billy Graham still claim to preach this gospel
of Rome?
3. Rome's
gospel denies justification by grace through faith in the
merits of the righteousness of Christ.
"If anyone shall say
that it is by the righteousness of Christ itself that men
are formally justified, -- let him be accursed" (Council
of Trent, Session VI, Canon 10). "If anyone shall say that
justifying faith is nothing else than trust in the Divine
mercy pardoning sins for Christ's sake; or that is is that
trust alone by which we are justified, -- let him be accursed"
(Canon 10). Here Rome places her curse on the very Word of
God!.
The Bible says, "By the deeds of the law there shall no
flesh be justified in his sight ... But now the righteousness
of God ... which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon
all them that believe" (Romans 3:20-22).
Again it states; "A man is justified by faith without
the deeds of the law" (Romans 3:28), and "God imputeth
righteousness without works" (Romans 4:6).
Rome's gospel is a gospel of human works and merits. "Sins
must be expiated. This may be done on this earth through
sorrows, miseries and trials of this life and, above all,
through death. Otherwise, the expiation must be made in the
next life through fire and torments or purifying punishment"
(Vat. II, Indulgentiarum Doctrina, I.2).
In total contrast, the Bible says, "Being now justified by
his [Christ's] blood, we shall be saved from wrath through
him" (Romans 5:9).
Again: "Therefore being [i.e., having been] justified by
faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ"
(Romans 5:1). "There is therefore now no condemnation to them
which are in Christ Jesus" (Romans 8:1). The Apostle John
gives the reason for this freedom from condemnation: "Your
sins are forgiven you for his [Christ's] name's sake" (I John
2:12).
The gospel is "Blessed are they whose iniquities are
forgiven, and whose sins are covered. Blessed is the man to
whom the Lord will not impute sin" (Romans 4:7-8). This is the
gospel that Rome rejects.
Does Billy Graham still claim to preach this gospel
of Rome?
4. Rome's
gospel denies the sole mediation of Christ.
"The blessed Virgin is
invoked in the Church under the titles of Advocate, Helper,
Benefactress, and Mediatrix" (Vatican II, Lumen Gentium,
VIII Para. 62). Paragraph 61 of the same document says
Mary "shared her Son's sufferings as He died on the cross.
Thus, in a wholly singular way she co-operated... in the work
of the Savior in restoring supernatural life to souls." Pope
John Paul II has flatly stated that in Mary "is effected the
reconciliation of God with humanity ..., is accomplished the
work of reconciliation" (Pope John Paul II, On
Reconciliation and Penance, St. Paul Editions, p.139).
It is vain for Rome to claim that all this does not violate
the Scripture, which says, "There is ... one mediator
between God and men, the man Christ Jesus" (I Timothy
2:5). The Bible says, "God was in Christ [not Mary],
reconciling the world unto himself" (II Corinthians 5:19).
Again, the Bible says, "God hath given to us eternal life and
this life is in his Son" (I John 5:11). Contrast the
slogan adopted by the second Vatican Council, "Death
through Eve, life through Mary" (Lum. Gent., VIII
Para. 56).
This is Rome's gospel.
Does Billy Graham still boast of preaching the same
gospel?
If he does he can have no message of salvation.
Rome's gospel pronounces a curse on any man who comes to
believe that he is assured of salvation and heaven in this
life: "If any says that he will for certain ... have that
great gift of perseverance unto the end, -- let him be
accursed" (Council of Trent, Session VI, Canon 16). Has Billy
Graham no better message than this?
Does he still preach Rome's gospel?
The Apostle Paul opposed such as preached a gospel like
Rome's. He said, "Though we, or an angel from heaven,
preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have
preached unto you, let him be accursed" (Galatians 1:8).
Paul curses Rome's gospel, but Billy Graham boasts that it is
the same as the one he preaches.
DR. GRAHAM HAILS
THE POPE AS "THE GREATEST RELIGIOUS LEADER OF THE MODERN
WORLD."
He wrote this in a
lengthy article in the Saturday Evening Post, Jan./Feb.
1980, and went on to refer to John Paul II as "one of the
greatest moral and spiritual leaders of this century," "an
evangelist," who "sought to speak to the spiritual hunger of
our age in the same way Christians throughout the centuries
have spoken to the spiritual yearning of every age -- by
pointing people to Christ."
All this is most deceitful. John Paul II proclaims every
Roman Catholic heresy noted above -- and then goes even
further.
1. The Pope bans
sinners from going directly to Christ for pardon.
Confession to a priest
to obtain absolution from him "constitutes the only ordinary
way in which the faithful who are conscious of serious sin are
reconciled with God ... every serious sin must always be
stated, with its determining circumstances, in an individual
confession." (John Paul II, On Reconciliation and
Penance, p.132. The emphasis is his. The only
extraordinary way he allows is confession to a priest or
priests in a group exercise pp. 128, 132.)
The Pope allows no access to Christ for pardon, except
through a human priest. Is this "pointing men to Christ"?
Nowhere in the New Testament is any man placed between a
penitent sinner and Christ.
Jesus said: "Come unto me ... and I will give you rest"
(Matthew 11:28).
The Bible says, "Having therefore, brethren, boldness to
enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus, by a new and
living way, which he hath consecrated for us, through the
veil, that is to say, his flesh; and having an high priest
[Christ] ... let us draw near with a true heart in full
assurance of faith" (Hebrews 10:19-22).
John Paul II utterly contradicts this. Far from pointing
men to Christ, he places a barrier in their way to keep them
from Christ.
2. The Pope
invites men "to turn with me to the Immaculate Heart of Mary,
Mother of Jesus, in whom 'is effected the reconciliation of
God with humanity.'"
He says that to Mary's
Immaculate Heart "we have repeatedly entrusted the whole of
humanity" (Reconciliation and Penance, pp.139, 140).
The Bible knows nothing of such language. Paul said, "I
commend you to God, and to the word of his grace" (Acts 20:32)
-- not to Mary.
What kind of spiritual leadership is the Pope giving? Is he
pointing men to Christ? How can Billy Graham appeal to what
the Bible says and at the same time hail a Mariolator as an
evangelist who points men to Christ?
STOP PRESS
Pope John Paul II has
just published his twelfth encyclical, Ut Unum Sint
(May They All Be One). In it he said the Roman Catholic
Church would not change its doctrines for the sake of unity,
and asserted his rule as the prime mover behind the
ecumenical movement.
"With the power and the authority without which such an
office would be illusory, the Bishop of Rome must ensure the
communion of all churches," he wrote in the 115-page document.
"For this reason, he is the first servant of unity."
The European, 2-8 June 1995
DR. GRAHAM SENDS
HIS ENQUIRERS INTO ROMAN CATHOLICISM, EASTERN ORTHODOXY,
LIBERAL PROTESTANTISM, ETC.
Long ago Dr. Graham
stated his policy for following up an enquirer: "His name and
address and a lot of information about him is taken and within
24 hours that is sent to a minister of the church of his
choice regardless of denomination" (Interview in U.S. News
and World Report, August 27, 1954). This policy has been
consistently carried out. For example, in the Milwaukee
crusade of 1979, Sister Maureen Hopkins, a Roman Catholic nun,
was a member of the crusade committee. She received some 3,500
names and telephone numbers for her church to follow up. All
3,500 were invited to a special mass (remember what we showed
about the mass) "to remind enquirers that their commitments to
Christ should be nurtured within the sacramental framework of
the Church" (The Christian Courier, Milwaukee,
September 1979).
Does the Bible have anything to say about such a policy? It
certainly does.
In the early church, converts "continued stedfastly in the
apostles' doctrine and fellowship" (Acts 2:42). They were not
placed under the care of deniers of the gospel. The Bible
says, "Have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of
darkness, but rather reprove them" (Ephesians 5:100). Dr.
Graham's policy is a blatant violation of the Bible which he
professes to hold as his supreme authority. No converts should
be sent to any church where they cannot emulate the converts
of apostolic times and fellowship on the basis of sound
doctrine.
DR. GRAHAM BETRAYS
HIS BAPTIST BRETHREN IN RUSSIA
Of Russia Dr. Graham
said, "I think there is a lot more freedom here than has been
given the impression in the States because there are hundreds,
thousands of churches open." He went on to give the impression
that he found more religious freedom in Russia than in
England: "In Great Britain, they have a state church ... Here
[in Russia] it is a free church, in the sense that it is not
headed officially, as the Church of England is headed by the
queen." (Los Angeles Times, May 14, 1982. Emphasis
added.)
A woman was arrested at one of his Russian meetings for
displaying a banner with the message "We have more than 150
prisoners for the work of the gospel." Dr. Graham defended the
police for arresting her. He said, "We detain people in the
United States if we catch them doing things that are wrong. I
have had people coming to my services in the United States
causing disturbances and they have been taken away by the
police."
The Bible says, "Remember them that are in bonds, as bound
with them; and them which suffer adversity, as being
yourselves also in the body" (Hebrews 13:3). Dr. Graham in
Russia did not want to be reminded of the Baptist pastors and
other Bible believers being held in prisons and concentration
camps for their faith. They are brave sufferes for Christ.
Billy Graham added to their agony. He stabbed them in the
back. He sided with the atheists who arrested a courageous
lady who dared to draw his attention to their plight and
condemned her as a disturber and a wrongdoer. Dr. Graham
should remember that the Bible says, "In the day that thou
stoodest on the other side, ... even thou wast as one of them"
(Obadiah 11). He identified his Russian friends, and they were
not his persecuted Baptist brethren. He stood on the other
side with their persecutors.
Dr. Graham appeals to the Bible. Judge his message, his
policy, and his fellowship by the Bible. By that standard he
stands exposed as blatantly flaunting the plainest statements
and standards of Scripture.
God's work cannot be done in such a way. The Bible says:
"Cursed be he that doeth the work of the Lord
deceitfully" (Jeremiah 48:10).
If the Bible is right, Dr. Graham is wrong. The Bible is
right.
Either Dr. Graham should drop his appeal to the Bible or he
should cease his wanton disobedience of its message and
methods.
We sincerely pray that even at this late stage Dr. Graham
will take the latter course and "earnestly contend for the
faith which was once delivered unto the saints" (Jude 3).
|